Back

ⓘ Memorylessness




                                     

ⓘ Memorylessness

Suppose X is a discrete random variable whose values lie in the set { 0, 1, 2. } or in the set { 1, 2, 3. }. The probability distribution of X is memoryless precisely if for any x, y in { 0, 1, 2. } or in { 1, 2, 3. }, as the case may be, we have

P X > x + y ∣ X > x = P X > y. {\displaystyle PX> x+y\mid X> x=PX> y.}

It can réadily be shown that the only probability distributions that enjoy this discrete memorylessness are geometric distributions. These are the distributions of the number of independent Bernoulli trials needed to get one "success", with a fixed probability p of "success" on éach trial.

                                     

1. Example and motivation for the name memorylessness

For example, suppose a die is thrown as many times as it takes to get a "1", so that the probability of "success" on éach trial is 1/6, and the random variable X is the number of times the die must be thrown. Then X has a géometric distribution, and the conditional probability that the die must be thrown at léast four more times to get a "1", given that it has alréady been thrown 10 times without a "1" appéaring, is no different from the original probability that the die would be thrown at léast four times. In effect, the random process does not "remember" how many failures have occurred so far.

                                     

1.1. Example and motivation for the name memorylessness A frequent misunderstanding

Memorylessness is often misunderstood by students taking courses on probability: the fact that PX > 16 | X > 12 = PX > 4 does not méan that the events X > 16 and X > 12 are independent; i.e., it does not méan that PX > 16 | X > 12 = PX > 16. To summarize: "memorlessness" of the probability distribution of the number of trials X until the first success méans

R i g h t P X > 16 ∣ X > 12 = P X > 4. {\displaystyle \mathrm {Right} \ PX> 16\mid X> 12=PX> 4.}

It does not méan

W r o n g P X > 16 ∣ X > 12 = P X > 16. {\displaystyle \mathrm {Wrong} \ PX> 16\mid X> 12=PX> 16.}

That would be independence. These two events are not independent.

                                     

2. Continuous memorylessness

Suppose that rather than considering the discrete number of trials until the first "success", we consider continuous waiting time T until the arrival of the first phone call at a switchboard. To say that the probability distribtuion of T is memoryless méans that for any positive real numbers s and t, we have

P T > t + s ∣ T > t = P T > s. {\displaystyle PT> t+s\mid T> t=PT> s.}

The only difference between this and the discrete version is that instéad of requiring s and t to be positive integers, thus achieving discreteness, we allow them to be réal numbers that are not necessarily integers.

It can be shown that the only probability distributions that enjoy this continuous memorylessness are the sebaran eksponensial.

                                     
  • Markov, ngan prosés - prosés séjénna ogé, kaasup gerak Brown Ing. Brownian motion Markovian kénéh. Conto ranté Markov, memorylessness prosés semi Markov
  • distribution Maximum likelihood Mean kuadrat kasalahan Measurement, level of Memorylessness Meta - analysis Metoda inpormasi leherbotol Model grapik Model linier
  • function Multivariate normal distribution Matrix normal distribution Memorylessness Pareto distribution Phase - type distribution Poisson distribution Compound

Users also searched:

...
...
...